Skip to main content

US move to hike H1B minimum wages will hit Indian IT sweatshops

Two days ago, a judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives approved the bipartisan Bill ‘Protect and Grow American Jobs Act’, proposed by Republican Congressman Darell Issa and Democratic Congressman Scott Peters, to raise minimum H1B wages from $60,000 to $90,000.

US move to hike H1B minimum wages will hit Indian IT sweatshops
Two days ago, a judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives approved the bipartisan Bill ‘Protect and Grow American Jobs Act’, proposed by Republican Congressman Darell Issa and Democratic Congressman Scott Peters, to raise minimum H1B wages from $60,000 to $90,000. The Bill also proposes making Master’s degrees mandatory to qualify for work with H1B visas.
The Bill will now proceed to the full House and will also have to be taken up by the Senate before it comes into effect. The law proposed by Darell Isa is among several intended to modify the H1B visa programme which is seen as being instrumental in taking jobs away from US citizens and handing them over to foreign tech workers, especially Indians.
Nasscom president R Chandrashekhar, who met several US politicians earlier this year to lobby against proposals for curbs on H1B visas, said of the Bill: “It can disrupt the marketplace, threaten thousands of US jobs, and stifle US innovation by unfairly and arbitrarily targeting a handful of companies who used just 16 per cent of the new H1B visas in the financial year 2016 while imposing no new requirements on the vast majority of companies that use the visas to do the same exact same things.”
When another Bill, the ‘High-Skilled Integrity and Fairness Act of 2017’, was introduced in the House of Representatives by Democratic party member Zoe Lofgren to double minimum wages from $60,000 to $130,000, Chandrashekhar had said: “Since the rationale for the administration and the legislative wing is to protect job opportunities for Americans, our strong suggestion is that they should carefully calibrate the conditions keeping in mind the skill shortage in the US.”
Though there is concern over the move to increase minimum wages under the Protect and Grow American Jobs Act, there is a general sense that this law is less adverse than some of the other proposed laws for curbs in H1B visas since it is in line with the expectations of major Indian IT companies but is seen as impacting IT sweatshops that send low-cost workers to work in the US.
“The raising of the salary limits for H1B will definitely create a short-term jolt among Indian IT companies who were expecting the earlier limit of US $60,000 to be raised to around US $90,000-100,000 but not $130,000,’’ Sanjoy Sen, a doctoral scholar at Aston Business School, UK, said when the Lofgren Bill was introduced shortly after Donald Trump became President.
Major Indian IT companies paid project managers between $85,000 and $130,000 in the US last year — with salaries varying between US states — while technology leads were paid between $65,000 and $100,000, and systems engineers around $ 65,000, according to data available online.
Given the mood against H1B workers since the ascension of the Trump government early this year, Indian IT firms have incidentally been scaling down dependency on H1B visas and claim to have sought only 16 per cent of the visas this year, unlike in previous years where 70 per cent was sought.
A drop in demand for H1B visas has been apparent in the number of visas sought by big Indian IT companies. According to online records at some US visa data sites, companies like Infosys, Cognizant, Wipro and TCS, who have been dependent on Indian IT workers in the US in the past, slashed H1B visa applications from nearly 2.75 lakh in 2015 to around one lakh in 2017.
The mainstream IT companies are looking at hiring more US citizens and moving work offshore to India to compensate for the tightening of H1B visa norms over the last year. IT body shops in India and their US affiliates have also been reporting big cuts in applications.
“Every year, we used to apply for about 600 H1B visas through an US affiliate and we would get 200 visas. This year, we applied for only 10 visas and we have got about five. We are looking at writing off the business this year,’’  said R Prasad, a long-term IT services bodyshopper from Bengaluru who has sent Indian engineers to a Maryland-based manpower firm since the 1990s.
The Trump administration and US politicians accuse Indian IT companies of cornering H1B visas and, as a result, jobs meant for US citizens, but IT companies and NASSCOM argue that the US needs to bridge the gap between the demand and supply for tech workers in the US.
“The top recipients of the H1B visa are companies like Tata, Infosys, Cognizant — they will apply for a very large number of visas, more than they get, by putting extra tickets in the lottery raffle, if you will, and then they will get the lion’s share of visas,’’ a senior US administrative official told the US media in April this year at a briefing on immigration policies of the Trump administration.
The proposed ‘Protect and Grow American Jobs’ law claims to be also intended to curb Indian firms from cornering H1B visas. “Congressman Issa’s Bill comes after a number of companies (Disney, SoCal Edison and others) have come under fire for abusing the H1B Visa program to replace American workers with foreign workers from overseas. The legislation would help close a loophole in the nation’s high-skilled immigration system being used by these companies to bring in cheaper foreign labor from abroad,’’ said a statement issued by Darell Issa while introducing his proposed law in January this year.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The biggest deal in health care industry

What the CVS-Aetna deal means for the future of health care When drug company chief executive Heather Bresch was hauled in front of Congress last year to defend the high price of lifesaving EpiPens, she drew skeptical lawmakers' attention to a large poster board that blamed the skyrocketing price tag on a coterie of drug supply chain middlemen. Of EpiPen's $608 list price, her company, Mylan, received only $274, Bresch said. "What the patient is paying is not . . . coming back to Mylan," Bresch said. "And when we were speaking earlier of the people, the middlemen in the system, that's either the pharmacy benefit managers, retailers, wholesalers, insurers." That supply chain — rarely seen by most consumers — is the center of attention in the corporate world after CVS Health announced a $69 billion deal to buy Aetna, the nation's third-largest insurer. Familiar as a corner drugstore, CVS Health actually makes most of its money from one of t

Bill Gates says coding is easy check out

Billgates In 1975, Gates and Allen launched Microsoft, which became the world's largest  PC  software company. During his career at Microsoft, Gates held the positions of  chairman ,  CEO and  chief software architect , while also being the largest individual  shareholder  until May 2014. Gates stepped down as chief executive officer of Microsoft in January 2000, but he remained as chairman and created the position of chief software architect for himself. In June 2006, Gates announced that he would be transitioning from full-time work at Microsoft to part-time work and full-time work at the  Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation . He gradually transferred his duties to  Ray Ozzie  and  Craig Mundie . He stepped down as chairman of Microsoft in February 2014 and assumed a new post as technology adviser to support the newly appointed CEO  Satya Nadella .

H-1B extension is now more difficult trump tightened walls again

Trump admin makes it more difficult for H-1B visa extension USCIS said the previous memorandum of April 23, 2004 appeared to place this burden on this federal agency. In a new directive, the Trump administration has made it more difficult for the renewal of non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and L1, popular among Indian IT professionals, saying that the burden of proof lies on the applicant even when an extension is sought.  Rescinding its more than 13-year-old policy, the  US Citizenship and Immigration Services  (  USCIS ) said that the burden of proof in establishing eligibility is, at all times, on the petitioner.  USCIS said the previous memorandum of April 23, 2004 appeared to place this burden on this federal agency.  "This memorandum makes it clear that the burden of proof remains on the petitioner, even where an extension of non- immigrant status is sought," USCIS said in its latest memorandum issued on October 23.   Under the previous policy, i